D1 diagram: reference, object and next step
Reference, object, outcome: keep the questions separate.

The record at a glance

Catalogue category
Cricket
Developer named by source
WinSports Hub
Source-listed version
1.0
Source-listed size
19.74 MB
Artifact relation
Standard/Sports container

The catalogue record and its attribution

The dated catalogue attributes Come Fantasy App to WinSports Hub and displays 1.0 at 19.74 MB. These are source fields, not a company identity authenticated by D1. The listing is one editorial entry in a larger collection; it does not establish a separately implemented Android product for every title.

A multi-sport container needs separate rulebooks

This record broadens preparation across sports. A common calendar can organise events, while cricket participation, football roles and external scoring remain different. It would be misleading to treat a shared package as evidence of a single interoperable fantasy system.

The same captain multiplier is applied across sports

A worksheet borrows a cricket multiplier and applies it to a football competition without checking its rulebook. The multiplication may be correct while the eligibility assumption is wrong. A multi-sport collection should preserve the scoring table, fixture and accepted entry for each competition. A shared package or calendar is an organisational convenience, not evidence that accounts, scoring rules or deadlines are shared.

Use one notebook without inventing one rulebook

The cricket side can record toss, announced XI and bowling or batting opportunity. The football side needs team sheets, positional roles and expected minutes. Keep scoring tables and external deadlines attached to the relevant competition. A shared calendar or package can organise both while leaving their rules and accounts independent.

Resolve the no-sync recovery question before relying on notes

If a description promises local use without remote synchronisation, ask where private notes persist and whether they can be exported. A public website can be downloaded again after a reset; an unexported private annotation cannot be assumed to reappear. The same distinction applies to customer-care searches: D1 can explain the catalogue evidence, while the actual provider owns its account recovery and data process.

Which Android artifact is being compared?

The following fields identify the historical artifact associated with this catalogue record. They were retained in the 30–31 October 2026 source archive, not measured again by D1 for this article. The case above concerns the same captain multiplier is applied across sports, so file identity and the claimed user outcome must be assessed separately.

Historical artifact reference
FieldValue
Packagecom.come.sports
Version1.0 / code 1
Byte count20,696,772 bytes
SHA-2566bf5b47239c4407dfb97d7c49b5639ab1f7b335fb5fff05e0360aa1f11338ccd
ObservationReference archive, 30–31 October 2026

What the device record can settle

The Android reference connected with Come Fantasy App uses SDK 24 as its minimum, or Android 7.0, and target SDK 36. Its signing reference reads Android Debug; debuggable=true. These are manifest and certificate observations. They do not demonstrate installer acceptance, first launch or privacy behaviour on a device. A PC shortcut or iPhone PWA needs a separate attributable object.

Where the provider takes over

If Come Fantasy App leads to another origin, record that origin before entering account details. A wrapper can launch a page without owning its login. A saved draft or local note also cannot establish an accepted contest entry. Registration, authentication and a financial review remain distinct events.

Read the failed assumption before repeating the action

The same captain multiplier is applied across sports: diagnostic comparison
ObservationWhat it establishesRemaining question
Same multiplier typed twiceRepeated arithmeticDo both competitions specify it?
Different event scoring tablesDifferent eligible baseWhich actions count in each sport?
Shared local worksheetPreparation containerWhich provider accepted each entry?

Choose by task rather than a similar name

The neighbouring record below examines a related task from another angle. Use it to compare the workflow described for Come Fantasy App, rather than treating two catalogue names as two authenticated native applications.

Q / A

Common questions

The same captain multiplier is applied across sports — what remains to check?

Shared local worksheet: Preparation container. Which provider accepted each entry?

READ THE SOURCE / CHECK THE DATE

Documents & references

Dates below belong to the historical references. The writing date does not represent a new account or file test.

  1. ComeAPK — Come Fantasy App source record2026-10-30 · comeapk.dev
  2. ComeAPK — platform manifest2026-10-30 · comeapk.dev

D1 is an independent information publisher. Product providers handle their own accounts, files and transactions. How we write →